This can be a problem-especially in the workplace. Therefore, pragmatic types will try to remain as autonomous as possible so that they are able to make their own decisions. Contrarily, the pragmatic user will see other human beings as the roadblock getting in the way of their own desired result. There is going to be an issue if all parties inside the group are not cooperating, or if they witness the unfair treatment of another person that goes against the social rules or norms. Affiliative types can be independent thinkers, but when interacting with others inside a group setting, they would expect others to communicate or check-in with everyone else before making decisions. This doesn’t necessarily mean that all affiliative types are not independent minded or rely solely on group thinking. Pragmatic types value independence inside a group setting so that they are allowed the freedom of making their own decisions, while affiliative types value interdependence inside the group to achieve a desired result. Being affiliative means that a person’s basis for interaction is focused on what’s right. The affiliative types are the Idealist (NFs) and the Guardians (SJs). Being pragmatic means that a person’s preferred basis for interaction is focused on what works. The pragmatic types are the Intellectuals (NTs) and the Artisans (SPs). Since the simplest way to differentiate between them is juxtaposing one from the other, I will state why mistakes are made and how to correctly differentiate between the Affiliative and Pragmatic types. This appears to be specifically a problem when differentiating between Idealists (NFs) and Intellectuals (NTs). ![]() ![]() It can be commonly seen throughout the typology community that there is a misunderstanding of what it means to be affiliative or pragmatic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |